Ready to submit?

Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress

Go to submission page Instructions for authors Your submissions
Journal Description Journal History Editorial Team Contact Privacy Statement Copyright Notice
Current Issue Past Issues
GeoHuman: People, Place, and Power

Issue: Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): GeoHuman: People, Place, and Power

Submit an Article Journal Homepage
Share:
Views
-
Downloads
Articles Open Access

Spatial Distortion and Local Political Preferences: An Analysis of the Modifiable Area Unit Problem (MAUP) in the 2024 Tapin Regency Election

Dwi Angga Oktavianto
Bambang Sigit Widodo
Sanwit Iabchoon
Pages: 33-44
|
Published: 2026-05-06
|
Section: Articles
MAUP spatial voting behavior political geography electoral clusters Local elections
Abstract
Electoral studies in Indonesia are still dominated by aggregate analysis of macro-level administrative areas such as districts or provinces, often ignoring the spatial heterogeneity of voters' political preferences. This study aims to examine the distortion in the interpretation of regional head election results using the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) approach, using the 2024 Tapin Regency Pilkada (regional head election) as a case study, and integrating it with spatial voting and neighborhood effect theories. The study uses a quantitative-descriptive method based on electoral spatial analysis using valid vote acquisition data for candidate pairs at the sub-district level obtained from the Tapin Regency General Elections Commission. Analytical techniques include calculating vote percentages, electoral dominance indices, spatial mapping of political clusters, and simple spatial trend testing to identify patterns of interconnectedness between adjacent areas. The results show significant spatial polarization, with mining-based areas and transmigrant communities exhibiting very high vote dominance, while traditional agrarian and urban-periurban areas exhibit more open electoral competition. The aggregation of results at the district level has been shown to obscure the existence of opposition clusters and substantial swing areas, thus confirming the impact of MAUP on local electoral analysis. These findings confirm that voters' political preferences in Tapin are not solely determined by rational individual choices but are shaped by the region's economic structure, community social homogeneity, and the influence of the local social environment. Theoretically, this study strengthens the contribution of electoral political geography in Indonesia by emphasizing the importance of multi-scale spatial analysis in understanding the dynamics of local democracy and avoiding interpretation biases caused by administrative territorial aggregation.
References
  1. Agnew, J. (2018). Revisiting the territorial trap in political geography. Geopolitics, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1251905
  2. Anselin, L. (2010). Thirty years of spatial econometrics. Papers in Regional Science, 89(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00279.x
  3. Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Journal of Democracy, 30(3), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0034
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2000). Sensus Penduduk Tahun 2000: Data kependudukan menurut suku bangsa Kabupaten Tapin. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
  5. Cho, W. K. T., & Gimpel, J. G. (2012). Geographic information systems and political analysis. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032710-104818
  6. Dark, S. J., & Bram, D. (2007). The modifiable areal unit problem in physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography, 31(5), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133307083294
  7. Fossati, D., Aspinall, E., Muhtadi, B., & Warburton, E. (2020). Ideological representation in clientelistic democracies: The Indonesian case. World Politics, 72(4), 623–659. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887120000123
  8. Fotheringham, A. S., & Wong, D. W. S. (1991). The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A, 23(7), 1025–1044. https://doi.org/10.1068/a231025
  9. Gimpel, J. G., Lay, J. C., & Schuknecht, J. E. (2018). Cultivating the grass roots: Geographic and social context in political participation. Political Geography, 62, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.10.003
  10. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Political disagreement in social networks: The dynamics of political learning. American Political Science Review, 89(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/2083070
  11. Johnston, R., Jones, K., & Manley, D. (2020). The geography of voting revisited: New models of electoral geography. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 737–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519850840
  12. Lee, D. W., Rogers, M., & Soifer, H. D. (2025). The modifiable areal unit problem in political science. Political Analysis, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2025.2
  13. Lee, S., Chun, Y., & Griffith, D. A. (2016). Exploring the impacts of the modifiable areal unit problem on spatial analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30(11), 2157–2175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1151217
  14. Manley, D., Flowerdew, R., & Steel, D. (2019). Scales, levels and processes: Studying spatial influences on electoral behavior. Geographical Analysis, 51(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12175
  15. Rodden, J. (2019). Political geography and the urban–rural divide. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070345
  16. Sinclair, B. (2012). The social citizen: Peer networks and political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00544.x
  17. Xu, Y., Chen, Y., & Li, Z. (2021). Revisiting MAUP effects in spatial electoral analysis. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(6), 1562–1578. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320941205
  18. Zhang, X., Burkhanova, D., Yang, Y., & Tian, J. (2025). Political participation and grassroots governance: A social work perspective based on CGSS 2021 data. PLoS ONE, 20(12), e0337520. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337520

How to Cite

Spatial Distortion and Local Political Preferences: An Analysis of the Modifiable Area Unit Problem (MAUP) in the 2024 Tapin Regency Election. (2026). GeoHuman: People, Place, and Power, 1(2), 33-44. https://journal.bumi-spasial.com/index.php/geohuman/article/view/11

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.